The controversy of stem cell research
Moreover, in medical research, human cells are commonly injected into nonhuman animals and incorporated into their functioning tissue.
Ethical issues of stem cell therapy
However, this assumption does not necessarily hold in the context of embryo research. The moral and political controversy arises from the fact that extracting the stem cells destroys the blastocyst. Moreover, healthy volunteers, both men and women, are paid to undergo other invasive research procedures, such as liver biopsy, for research purposes. They believe that embryonic stem cell research profits from and violates the sanctity of life and is tantamount to murder. More research will be required before noncancerous stem cells can be created. SCL: What are the main arguments for and against embryonic stem cell research? Although much more research is necessary before stem cell therapies can become part of regular medical practice, the science around stem cells is developing all the time. Moreover, some people argue that because the technique of SCNT can be used for reproduction, its development and use for basic research should be banned. As discussed in Section B. However, most ART clinics obtain donor sperm from sperm banks and generally have no direct contact with the donors.
Second, investigators in hESC clinical trials should discuss a broader range of information with potential participants than in other clinical trials. However, in hESC transplantation, nonmedical issues may be prominent or even decisive for some participants.
In the past, it has been a necessity to research embryonic stem cells and in doing so destroy them for research to progress.
Benefits of stem cell research
Scientists can harvest stem cells in different ways. Others argue that it is immoral not to do this research, if doing so could lead to treatments for disease. Informed consent for donation of materials for stem cell research. The term was later used in by William Sedgwick to describe the parts of a plant that grow and regenerate. The embryo has increasing status as it develops An embryo deserves some protection from the moment the sperm fertilizes the egg, and its moral status increases as it becomes more human-like. Although much more research is necessary before stem cell therapies can become part of regular medical practice, the science around stem cells is developing all the time. Fox , who have lived with these conditions, respectively. President Bush is a case in point. These cells are reducing the need for human embryos in research and opening up exciting new possibilities for stem cell therapies. But this biological fact does not establish that the blastocyst is a human being, or a person. Despite their developmental continuity, acorns and oak trees differ. Under federal regulations, research with fetal tissue is permitted provided that the donation of tissue for research is considered only after the decision to terminate pregnancy has been made.
Who says stem cell research is wrong? If so, they are making a mistake. President George W.
To me, the morality of the situation dictates that these embryos, which are routinely discarded, be used to improve and save lives. Human life develops by degrees. Furthermore, iPS cells may not be able to answer some important questions about early human development. New embryonic stem cell lines from frozen embryos Women and couples who undergo infertility treatment often have frozen embryos remaining after they complete their infertility treatment.
Nature Reports Stem Cells 14 June Download Citation Some opponents of stem cell research argue that it offends human dignity or harms or destroys human life. Reprogramming has been successfully accomplished without known oncogenes and using adenovirus vectors rather than retrovirus vectors.
based on 30 review