Ethics as source of group strength One problem with ethics is the way it's often used as a weapon.
The word carries the concepts of: 1 moral standards, with regard to behavior; 2 moral responsibility, referring to our conscience; and 3 a moral identity, or one who is capable of right or wrong action.
It helps you understand your dilemma. Don't get confused. Consequentialism This is the ethical theory that most non-religious people think they use every day. This may not stop someone from doing wrong, but, within themselves, I believe that they know they are doing wrong.
What would you do differently? Point 3 is where most disagreement surfaces.
Most undergraduate teaching programs offer some classes on ethics, due to the litigation society we live in It teaches that the only source of moral rules is God. Emotivism Emotivism is the view that moral claims are no more than expressions of approval or disapproval. Making Choices Ethical dilemmas involve choices among competing values.
On the face of it, it [ethical realism] means the view that moral qualities such as wrongness, and likewise moral facts such as the fact that an act was wrong, exist in rerum natura, so that, if one says that a certain act was wrong, one is saying that there existed, somehow, somewhere, this quality of wrongness, and that it had to exist there if that act were to be wrong.